Search for: All records

The detailed evaluation of expected losses and damage experienced by structural and nonstructural components is a fundamental part of performance-based seismic design and assessment. The FEMA P-58 methodology represents the state of the art in this area. Increasing interest in improving structural performance and community resilience has led to widespread adoption of this methodology and the library of component models published with it. This study focuses on the modeling of economies of scale for repair cost calculation and specifically highlights the lack of a definition for aggregate damage, a quantity with considerable influence on the component repair costs. The article illustrates the highly variable and often substantial impact of damage aggregation that can alter total repair costs by more than 25%. Four so-called edge cases representing different damage aggregation methods are introduced to investigate which components experience large differences in their repair costs and under what circumstances. A three-step evaluation strategy is proposed that allows engineers to quickly evaluate the potential impact of damage aggregation on a specific performance assessment. This helps users of currently available assessment tools to recognize and communicate this uncertainty even when the tools they use only support one particular damage aggregation method. A case study of a 9-story building illustrates the proposed strategy and the impact of this ambiguity on the performance of a realistic structure. The article concludes with concrete recommendations toward the development of a more sophisticated model for repair consequence calculation. 

Post-disaster housing recovery models increase our understanding of recovery dynamics, vulnerable populations, and how people are affected by the direct losses that disasters create. Past recovery models have focused on single-family owner-occupied housing, while empirical evidence shows that rental units and multi-family housing are disadvantaged in post-disaster recovery. To fill this gap, this article presents an agent-based housing recovery model that includes the four common type–tenure combinations of single- and multi-family owner- and renter-occupied housing. The proposed model accounts for the different recovery processes, emphasizing funding sources available to each type–tenure. The outputs of our model include the timing of financing and recovery at building resolution across a community. We demonstrate the model with a case study of Alameda, California, recovering from a simulated M7.0 earthquake on the Hayward fault. The processes in the model replicate higher non-recovery of multi-family housing than single-family housing, as observed in past disasters, and a heavy reliance of single-family renter-occupied units on Small Business Administration funding, which is expected due to low earthquake insurance penetration. The simulation results indicate that multi-family housing would have the highest portion of unmet need remaining; however, some buildings with unmet needs are anticipated to be able to obtain a large portion of their funding. The remaining portion may be filled using personal financing or may be overcome with downsizing or downgrades. Multi-family housing would also benefit the most from Community Development Block Grants for Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR). This benefit is a result of modeling the financing sources, that CDBG-DR is available, and that many multi-family buildings do not qualify for other sources. Communities’ allocation of public funding is important for housing recovery. Our model can help inform and compare potential financing policies to allocate public funds.